X-Men '92 #3

X-Men '92 #3

Writer: Chad Bowers, Chris Sims Artist: Scott Koblish Publisher: Marvel Comics Release Date: August 26, 2015 Cover Price: $4.99 Critic Reviews: 4 User Reviews: 3
7.1Critic Rating
5.3User Rating

• When the X-Men are in trouble who can Westchester depend on?
•  How about X-Force '92?
•  Cable, Deadpool, Domino, Psylocke, Archangel and Biushop enter the fray!
Rated T+

  • 8.0
    ComicWow!TV - Bhavna Bakshi Sep 1, 2015

    This series is getting better and better. Next issue will end the series, so I’m really curious as to where it can go from here. I know we’re going to get an epic battle, but I’m not sure what’ll come beyond that. Either way, I’m excited! Read Full Review

  • 8.0
    The Source by SuperHeroStuff - Zach Donley Aug 31, 2015

    Cassandra Nova intends to release The Phoenix, among other things.Im intrigued to see how this all gets wrapped up with a pretty little bow on it. The story will conclude in issue #4, but Id like to see more of X-Men 92. Ill be a bit let down if us fans get our team back just in time for the run to be over. Each issue Ive read gets a little more fun, though, so Im ready to dive in next time around. What are your thoughts? Would you like to see more of X-Men 92? Where do you think this is going? Till next time, let us know your thoughts, dreams, and fears below! Read Full Review

  • 6.5
    IGN - Levi Hunt Aug 27, 2015

    Hopefully the creators get another crack at telling X-Men '92 stories after Secret Wars, because they're frustratingly close now, just not quite there. Read Full Review

  • 6.0
    All-Comic - Jeremy Matcho Aug 31, 2015

    As far as capturing a time period goes, X-Men 92 nails it. Sims and Bowers get so many things right about this age of the X-Men that should have any fanboy smiling. The art is a bit (lame pun) sketchy, but Matt Milla kills it with his colors. This is a book for people who loved 90s X-Men and its a great opportunity to go back with a fresh story. Read Full Review

Recommended For You

Reviews for
the Week of...