You asked for evidence and while this is not that it certainly shows your biases. So ready to call this chap misogynistic you blundered into calling him out instead of reviewing the book itself. As you said "Curious". At least you had the sense to leave the original "review" in tact as you would have no doubt been eaten alive on here by what I'm sure is a countless amount of people who despise you and would loved to have called you out on it

Congrats btw. You got me to waste some time going through your garbage for a laugh. You accused me of not reading your reply and this gentleman of hating women because you don't pay attention. I assume you paid attention to V for vendetta in a similar fashion.

You mean to tell me that you went back months on my reviews and all you could find was a review where I know I'm in the wrong and kept it up anyway because I've got some sort of integrity? Why don't you look at other reviews of mine for this very title where I give issues mediocre or even downright bad ratings?

I have been very open about Wonder Woman being a character that bores me with plenty of reviews about how bad her book has been for nearly 5+ years. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

But you're incapable of understanding the most basic of nuance, which is why you couldn't comprehend the in-your-face, screaming lunatic politics of V for Vendetta and outted yourself as moron

Actually I was looking at DC fan of sorts reviews and happened to see your foolish review. I told you I don't have time to go through your thousands of "reviews". I saw it and as I said wasted my time reading it because I noticed the edit you put in. And the gotcha isn't about Wonder Woman. I thought that was clear but it's apparent to me now you either don't understand, don't pay attention, or outright refuse to admit I'm right and make yourself look foolish by seeming oblivious.

You say you will make fun of other aspects of his character (again not reviewing THIS ISSUE OF THE COMIC). You assume HIS character is misogynistic even though you now say YOU find this comic boring and you yourself have given it bad reviews. I don't assume you hate women writers but you quickly assume this of him. Your leanings deemed this person a bigot in your eyes even though he hated the same book as you. As you yourself say, curious.

I also thought I explained why you left it in and it had nothing to do with integrity. Oh that's right, I covered that in the first part of my comments. I think it's the seeming oblivious reason myself. Why did you edit it btw? Got called out by someone who is now banned? Wait, that's right. You said yourself you never got anyone banned and as we all know you have soooo much integrity.

He's a bigot because of his other reviews, of which we've both seen plenty. What you see here is me making a bad assumption based on loads of evidence but cruxing it on this specific piece of, what turned out to be, not evidence. Hence my unapologetic tone in the correction. I was wrong in this instance, yes, but there are plenty of other instances where I'm not. I didn't just pick his name out of a hat at random.

I can't remember who I got called out by, if I did at all. The funniest thing about the banning stuff is I know exactly who was working with Dan to get people off the site and they are no longer active on the site themselves. This conspiracism is so unfounded, so lazy, so stupid. I literally have nothing to hide here.

I just looked and can see no bigoted reviews. You called someone's review into question instead of giving a review yourself because you didn't like their tastes and assumed it was bigoted. 1) doesn't pay attention 2) bullies for no reason someone you don't know who thinks differently. The guy calls Diana iconic in his review for crying out loud. You are the type of pitiful troll that gave SJW's a bad name.

I feel like I could stare at a blank wall, pick a random comic, and review it with a random string of words and ideas, and still be called more attentive than you. I've never considered myself an SJW, but the label doesn't bother me. Bullying is fine when it's done to people who simply use their reviews to hate on creators and their work.

Your not an SJW. Your just what people who hate the term think of as an SJW. Your brand of priggishness is what has caused it. Your a stain on humanity and your last sentence shows it. It's not like he's review bombing. He just doesn't give reviews to books he likes. It's not bigotry. He's not shitting on anyone based on their membership to a particular group. Unless you count the shitty writers club.

Oh, he's definitely review bombing. He goes out of his way to only rate things he doesn't like, and also his justification most of the time may as well not exist because it adds nothing.

Btw, the issue with SJWs was often how overzealous they were, not that they were wrong. If you think I'm being priggish for not being nice towards people who don't deserve it, you may be a snowflake.

I just like to call people dicks when they deserve it. Dick. Your also not priggish for being a dick at random. LOLs are fine. It's shit like your reviews on Robin that set that standard......DICK.

Is having any sort of axiom considered being priggish? I have some moral principles that I use to guide what's right or wrong. So does everyone else. If I think someone is being harmful, it's perfectly okay for me to say something, as goes for everyone else.

Principles are wonderful. The problem is you have a moral compass but it appears you always carry a magnet in your pocket. The priggishness is that you know it's there but won't remove it.

You're basically trying to get at me for not foregoing my principles for the sake of strangers online liking me more. I don't think there's room to budge on a lot of these issues.