Yeah I got blocked too. Which is weird.

If you want to talk about it more, just go to the discord linked on my profile.

Did you really call her "it". You're a huge piece of shit.

Did you even read what I wrote???? Love that you jump this. TBH I knew someone like you would. You may as well say "You called someone an asshole??? How dare you you?" Do you understand context? Do you even know what was said? You're a moron but I guess for people like you it can't go both ways right? Trans people are not some protected species immune from insult.

My girlfriend is trans and if she said something like this pos said I'd first break up then call her the same thing. Calling someone who doesn't agree with you a nazi is pretty insulting too but that's ok. Fact is arguing with a POS like you never gets anywhere so or solves anything because your immune to change....which is pretty conservative thinking now that I think about it. Anyhow I'm done. Rant away.

I'm sure your girlfriend would love to know that her basic validity and humanity is contingent on whether or not she agrees with you.

So you deliberately used "it" as an insult. With a trans girlfriend. Okay bud.

He supported Nazis. He was supported by Nazis. He carried Nazi ideals. He was a Nazi. Why don't you tell your girlfriend you called another trans person "it" because they said something you disagreed with and THEN tell them that you'd do that same to them if they had said it. See how that works out for you.

This issues reminded me a lot of Morrison’s first issue of Batman.

I think Snyder also had a weak finish

Oh dude, 100%. I wasn't even the biggest fan of Endgame. Everything after that was such a let down.

Issue 48 is of Snyders run is a classic for me. But to each his own.

I liked endgame, but the dullness started to creep. Overall i find the run fascinating and i like the discusion around it , but half of the arcs even from the start were not that great. I geniunly think city of owls is a spectacularly bad fumble.

I'm one of the few that didn't hate the Thomas Wayne Jr. aspect. I found it compelling especially in a world that for all we really knew, it was a reboot. It was fresh for the time though hindsight has shown that Lincoln Marsh was nothing special. Snyder kind of had a JJ Abrams thing going where he had this interesting idea but no real end to the thread. He did it with Marsh, did it with the Pale Man. Both cool ideas that fizzled because he either had no real end goal with it or DC said no.

Isn't Thomas Wayne Jr. originally a silver age invention? The Boomerang Killer?

I honestly also did not dislike Lincolm. I understood it's place in the story and what it tried to say and as psycamorean said it was an interesting homage to the silver age, making it seem like the future of the batman's comics would be very different than what it was before(albeit Morisson did similar things). What i disliked is how it was revealed. Not even in the sense that lincolm was sus from the start, but the exposition dump while the grandiose brawl was going.

The court of owls for me was such a creeping, well build experience, while city of owls felt disjoined, at times rushed and it was almost like skipping chapters for me personally. I liked the message. It made a great thesis for the whole run, but even that felt weird in its delivery as the ending was such a departure of what i liked previously.

I agree the use of "they" over and over, took me right out of the story - especially when Han could tell that the assassin was a female.

Yep, and this is the first time I have seen Segura do this in his writing. Very strange choice. Espeicailly for this scene.

How is using the term "they" altering the English language? It is literally a word in that language. It works perfectly in the context of when it was being used. It is used every day for millions of people non-discerning of gender. It's not a political statement. Why is that problematic or is it just something that confuses small boomer brains who can't spell "especially", especially well?

I'm not even responding to the stupidity of your response. Please stop conmmenting on my posts. Block me or something.

What part of MY response was stupid over your own review? Answer me those questions I presented and I will gladly stay away from your posts.

What question? The English language (and all others throughout the world) state that word "They" regards multiple poeple not a solitary individual. I, for one, will not be altering the traditional version of the English language. Now go away.

The term "they" has also been used for a long, long time to refer to someone of an unspecified gender. One example could be "are they a boy or a girl?" Yes, "they" can refer to multiple people as a group, but it, just like many other words, has more than one use.

The first documented use of "they" in reference to a singular noun was in the 1300s per Oxford English Dictionary. And I say people like fzanca making these reviews ought to return to tradition like the rest of us.

They can mean a single individual - "They are over there". For gods' sakes you're supposed to be a writer! I also love how you edited that comment and not your own previous misspelling. But a deal is a deal, however poorly you defended your veiled bigotry, bye now! #neflix

They can be used where the gender of the individual is unknown but if it's known then it's plural. Martin says the assassin was clearly female so it probably shouldn't have been used but some feel it's offensive to assume someones gender because a few believe gender is a choice. Stupid sounding to me but it's newer belief and each generation believes their way is the right way. If it takes you out of the story or not is just how you feel but it's not really bigotry. CALM.

"They can be used where the gender of the individual is unknown but if it's known then it's plural." this is just made up.

I guess you can google it. It has been changed RECENTLY to include nonbinary people as well because of all the uproar from certain people but until the last few years it didn't. Calling one person they is kinda the new made up thing here. Not really a big deal just true. As I said, things change and each generation makes new rules but you can't just change the past or the truth. I guess you can say traditionally it's true if it makes you feel better about it.

Anyway, this is all I'll say about it. Feel any way anyone wants it'll never be good enough. I'm done commenting or doing anything other than scoring comics. I see the same ol' faces on this site are still doing the same ol' thing and it's tiresome.

But I did Google it. Shakespeare used a singular they to refer to a man. It goes back that far. It's not something new and it's not about making new groups feel better about it. You're just wrong and clearly, your feelings are tied to that wrongness. May as well type out "sigh" while you're at it.

Sure, it's up now.

Thanks Dan