The art was bad. If you want to see good art go back to the 1990's triangle era art style...What was in this book might sell to some people but shouldn't be considered "Good"

To each his own and I grew up reading the 90's triangle era so I have a strong connection to that art too.

RKS did you really just say that Jorge Jimenez and Dan Mora's art is bad? Yes art is subjective but they are two of the most premier current artists in the business. It might not be your taste but they are certainly not "bad" artists by any measure. Stop being such a stick in the mud. Not everything you review or comment has to be negative. No one is asking you to do it.

Hex take a look at page #5 and page #10...I rest my case. Superman's eyes look like he's on drugs. It's not a style it's a lack of actual talent.

You know even the best artists make mistakes right? DaVinci didn't paint the Mona Lisa in a day. Todd McFarlane has some pretty big blunders. Neal Adams, one of the best to ever do it was incredibly critical of his own work. Even as much as I rail against JRJR, he has some standouts. I'm not losing my mind over a couple of eyes.

You sound stupid

I'm not trying to ignore your point, simply trying to understand but isn't the point of all comics imaginary stories?

I just mean it leads us to believe it's showing us what happens, but at the end it turns out to just be a hypothetical.

Somebody read this issue during a hangover 0.o

Dude just stop reading comics if this is your mindset. At least quit reviewing. Most of your reviews are 10s or 1s. That’s not how an adult reviews things haha.

4/10? You don't know good comics.

I can't confirm your review because I stopped reading this title after the 1st issue. Snyder is just an Edgelord type writer, he's an over done one trick pony that DC doesn't care to send to the glue factory for some reason. Anyway write your reviews and ignore the "Dog Pile mentality" people who seek to silence anyone who dares to think for themselves.

RKS has a gooner Twitter account where he roleplays as Superman getting banged by Powergirl and Wonder Woman.

I don't see why that's a problem. People can have hobbies

Its more to illustrate that his priority isn't nor has it ever actually been the comics themselves or the quality therein. He's just an internet incel that cherry picks content and rails against anything modern. Ask him what he actually likes, he dodges the question. Look at his reviews, it's all just bad faith tanking. Not someone to be taken seriously and when they show up, should be written off quickly.

Fair enough

Both are bangers, why pit two bad bitches against each other?

North is the best thing to happen FF in decades. I'm sorry that you aren't able to see this. I assume North hating on authoritarians made you sad.

Yes, the guy who gave Maus a 10 hates people hating on authoritarians. Mind ya business Karen.

antiwoke doofus' are so easily triggered. Sad. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

Get 'em Chuck

Yeah wait a minute guys fthissite is correct. Amoebas giving Maus a 10 kind of breaks your argument to pieces. You should look through people's reviews before making assumptions and secondly even though I loved this ish there are some valid criticisms. One review in here talks about how Doom is usually more nuanced and always treats Latveria benevolently so to use their souls seems like a total destruction of the character. People on here should be allowed to not like a comic c'mon

lol, please, go look at the comments he left with his 1's and 2s. Just whining about 'wokeness' and identify politics. Him calling other people Karens is the cherry on top. Nobody whines more than bigots when the world doesn't constantly reflect them. Fuckin babies. Name dropping Maus is like a racist telling people they have a black friend so they can't possibly be racist..

To be clear, I'm talking about fthissite not Amoebas, I have no problem with Amoebas not liking North's take on FF, but clowns like fthissite review bomb anything that is "woke" (which to them means treating people who aren't white straight males with dignity) or critical of fascism.

I briefly looked through some of their 1s and 2s and I didnt see what your referring to? Amoebas specifically when he really gets into criticizing an issue really goes into the meat and uses references from old comics he knows his stuff. He's really good when he refers to FF stuff I respect that. Even if though, it's not my goal to police people's past reviews or thoughts. This review of his is not as thoughtful but when he really gets into it some good stuff to me.

Secondly if these guys bother you why give them any thought and do your own thing? Like this new ish has mostly good scores from users including me, why go out of your way to mess with the one or two guys who hated it? I think people should be allowed to express themselves so it leaves room for people to reflect. Like the first comment says "I assume North hating on authoritarians made you sad." That seems very childish to me

I want there too be people who have different opinions otherwise it's just a bubble of everyone saying the same thing and it becoming a non stop love fest. Sometimes critical reviews make me think of things from a different perspective more than a positive review does.

Like why didn't you guys debate with the review that gave this ish a 4.0, the guy claims he made a whole new account just to criticize this and gave his valid reasons. I think it would be more interesting to debate about the story rather than everyone trying to one up each other with modern day politics.

I've given like 2 books a 1 and said woke was a good thing. I don't know what they think review bombing is. I mean they're just throwing out the bigot card and outright lying or just not bothering to look into what they're saying. Some people just want to virtue signal and argue. I just hate Karen's being snide punks instead of simply saying "hey, what about this take on the book instead?". They're mad at being called out on their poor behavior and can only act offended even though they are

the offender. punk ass behavior

I agree the use of "they" over and over, took me right out of the story - especially when Han could tell that the assassin was a female.

Yep, and this is the first time I have seen Segura do this in his writing. Very strange choice. Espeicailly for this scene.

How is using the term "they" altering the English language? It is literally a word in that language. It works perfectly in the context of when it was being used. It is used every day for millions of people non-discerning of gender. It's not a political statement. Why is that problematic or is it just something that confuses small boomer brains who can't spell "especially", especially well?

I'm not even responding to the stupidity of your response. Please stop conmmenting on my posts. Block me or something.

What part of MY response was stupid over your own review? Answer me those questions I presented and I will gladly stay away from your posts.

What question? The English language (and all others throughout the world) state that word "They" regards multiple poeple not a solitary individual. I, for one, will not be altering the traditional version of the English language. Now go away.

The term "they" has also been used for a long, long time to refer to someone of an unspecified gender. One example could be "are they a boy or a girl?" Yes, "they" can refer to multiple people as a group, but it, just like many other words, has more than one use.

The first documented use of "they" in reference to a singular noun was in the 1300s per Oxford English Dictionary. And I say people like fzanca making these reviews ought to return to tradition like the rest of us.

They can mean a single individual - "They are over there". For gods' sakes you're supposed to be a writer! I also love how you edited that comment and not your own previous misspelling. But a deal is a deal, however poorly you defended your veiled bigotry, bye now! #neflix

They can be used where the gender of the individual is unknown but if it's known then it's plural. Martin says the assassin was clearly female so it probably shouldn't have been used but some feel it's offensive to assume someones gender because a few believe gender is a choice. Stupid sounding to me but it's newer belief and each generation believes their way is the right way. If it takes you out of the story or not is just how you feel but it's not really bigotry. CALM.

"They can be used where the gender of the individual is unknown but if it's known then it's plural." this is just made up.

I guess you can google it. It has been changed RECENTLY to include nonbinary people as well because of all the uproar from certain people but until the last few years it didn't. Calling one person they is kinda the new made up thing here. Not really a big deal just true. As I said, things change and each generation makes new rules but you can't just change the past or the truth. I guess you can say traditionally it's true if it makes you feel better about it.

Anyway, this is all I'll say about it. Feel any way anyone wants it'll never be good enough. I'm done commenting or doing anything other than scoring comics. I see the same ol' faces on this site are still doing the same ol' thing and it's tiresome.

So while we don't know the individual sales numbers for any series, (and we likely never will) we do know that Spider-Man almost always tops the charts. There are a few exceptions when something big hits and usurps the placement for a little while but Spider-Man is almost always at or near the top. THAT'S why things don't change. Because it already sells as much as they need it to without adjusting the status quo away from what they want, which is: poor Peter Parker, no long term relationships.

The Hush 2 event is only 6 issues long. For Part 1. We're getting the second half later. Aren't you excited?!

You want to point to those upset service members?

Wes from Thinking Critical, for one. Did you watch his review? He's ex-military. That was a good try though.

So one. That's a lot to you?

HAH dude's a scummy red-pilled shock jockey. That's not much of a source either.

He's also a friend of mine, so I'm going to discount your post.

The company you keep says enough about you to discount your posts.

Can't help but notice you always review books with black characters and creators very poorly. The same goes for any comic with LGBTQ+ representation. Its almost like you're upset at their very existence. Any reason for that?

now you understand why I say Absolute Superman is my favorite of all the Absolute series

I completely understand. It's absolutely magnificent, you were spot on my friend. Since the Brainiac issue it's constantly blowing my mind.