Batman: Pennyworth R.I.P. #1

Alfred Pennyworth served the Wayne family for decades-even through the tragic loss of Bruce Wayne's parents. His death at the hands of Bane is the only event that could possibly compare to that fateful night in Crime Alley, and it leaves Bruce at a similar crossroads. If Alfred was the glue that held the Bat-Family together, how will Batman deal with that all falling apart? And if the Caped Crusader is to be truly alone, he might either hang that cape up once and for all...or double down and carry on with this vengeful quest forever. Batman: Pennyworth R.I.P. #1 celebrates the life of one of the most important people in the history of Gotham City, while also addressing questions about what's next.

  • 4.5
    Nihilist Feb 12, 2020

    While the premise for this comic is definitely good, aside from the fact Alfred's death was one of the most disappointing moments in already utterly disappointing run of Tom King's Batman, the execution seems... cynical, calculated. It didn't feel like celebration of Alfred's life and his relations to the rest of the Bat Family. Instead, I though I'm reading carefully crafted chain of scenes designed to make me feel something, and fill the holes that Tom King should have filled during his run, instead of throwing meaningless filler at us every two weeks. Without proper setup, neither Alfred's death nor farewell mean much.
    It's like watching one of those Ronnie James Dio holograms - they're fake. They're there not to honor his legacy, but to make money off people who don't care if they see the real deal, or an artifficial creation devoid of any life. And that pretty much sums this comic up to me, albeit it has few decent moments, like Robin breaking down and admitting it's all his fault. Where did he go? Who knows, we may just hope Thomas Wayne didn't take him for an intergalactic decade long trip, so next time we see him, he's an adult.

    + LikeComments (51)
    Crimson Knight - Feb 12, 2020

    Why do you hate Tom King so much? I know he's not perfect but come on he's not atrocious!

    Crimson Knight - Feb 12, 2020

    I can agree his ending of Batman was indeed disappointing. Fine! But he's a good writer who at least does some interesting and unorthodox stories that often prove more entertaining then just another super hero book! Read his Vision series,Mr. Miracle,Swamp Thing and issues 36,37 and annual 2 of his Batman run. I promise you'll enjoy them.Dislike the end of his batman and Heroes in Crisis of you want, but going after the writer himself for a few bad issues? That's pretty shallow.

    myconius - Feb 12, 2020

    Nihilist - beautifully summed up as always! nice touch with the comparison of the Dio hologram. brilliant analogy.

    myconius - Feb 12, 2020

    when i buy cheap cash grabs . . . you know they always bring me down . . . they’re not free and i see that it's me . . . who's lost and never found.

    Crimson Knight - Feb 12, 2020

    Right no writers ever reuses similar themes or ideas! Every writer tells a story that's so different it might as well be a different writer. Right? So what Tom King's stories are always dark! It's better then seeing stories where the hero randomly comes up with a plan that's so crazy it just might work to save the day. And for the record DC Stuff I was just trying to help you out with the recommendations!! I'm sorry I didn't know I was talking to Tom King #1 not a fan!

    Crimson Knight - Feb 12, 2020

    DC Stuff We could go back and forth on this but I like Tom King and you obviously despise him. That's your opinion and I respect that.

    myconius - Feb 12, 2020

    ey! ey! EY!!! . . . DC Stuff is NOT "Tom King #1 not a fan". . . . . . no. that title proudly belongs to me!

    Psycamorean - Feb 12, 2020

    I'd just like to take the opportunity to mention the impetus behind this issue was completely manufactured by DC editorial, not Tom King, He was not going to kill Alfred, he was just going to do a fake out, but then DC editorial made it real because... I guess 5G? I don't know, but this is one case where Tom King doesn't deserve the hate.

    Nihilist - Feb 12, 2020

    Sorry for the delay in response, it's been a long, long day. @Crimson Knight - I don't hate King, in fact I really enjoyed his first few arcs of Batman series. Since then, however, it turned into a shallow, meaningless incoherent mixture of filler and repetitive deus ex machina infested shell of a plot. He had 80 issues to build and close a big story, and he didn't. Events written by others tried to explain what he forgot about, like Gotham Girl's motivations in the 2nd crossover with Flash.

    Nihilist - Feb 12, 2020

    I don't hate him, I'm just continuossly disappointed with his writing, being constantly reinforced in my negativity towards it. I'll pick Batman & Catwoman series up, for sure, but I'm not excited for it. I'm burned out by King. @DC Stuff beautifully dug into more details and examples of what in King's writing leaves a lot to be desired. But either way, we do not despise him. This is too much of a narrow generalization.

    Nihilist - Feb 12, 2020

    Also, you're right, YourGreenMuse, but still, he wrote the scene. He received directives from the editorial, so here come usual Didio jokes, but not blaming him for how bad it all turned out, would be a cop out, I think. We're talking about the same guy who gave Robin a deus ex machina to overpower Gotham Girl, with no explanation, foreshadowing, just nothing. Alfred's death was equally poor from the narrative perspective, and didn't impact the characters in the series. Hence this "filler" book.

    Toonstrack - Feb 12, 2020

    It seems like you are criticising this book using problems you had with Tom Kings run, and thats hardly fair. Sure your problems with his run might be valid but what does Tomasi and this book have to do with it?

    Br'er Lapin AKA 20-Ish Ceiln - Feb 13, 2020

    Since all the negative opinions jumped in about Tom King and his Batman. I am just here to say you aren't alone Crimson. I loved almost all of King's work (really only dislike HiC) and even recently his run on Batman was voted 7th best of the top 100 comics of the decade on CBR or Newsarama, one of the two. I can't disagree either. I have loved the run, and the ending was unsatisfying closure wise, but sorry... having your run cut is a legitimate excuse. Editorial have been bastards this whole t

    Br'er Lapin AKA 20-Ish Ceiln - Feb 13, 2020

    ime.

    myconius - Feb 13, 2020

    thank you DC Stuff. i promise to always honor the crown.

    myconius - Feb 13, 2020

    Toonstrack - you cannot overlook the problems of King's run and NOT see this book as a waste of time & money. this book ONLY EXISTS as a DIRECT RESULT of a terrible story choice MADE . BY . KING !!! . . . and i don't buy into that editorial forced him to kill Alfred. that cowardly worm needs to own his $#!%.

    Psycamorean - Feb 13, 2020

    I totally trust that DC editorial decided to kill Alfred... same way they chose which characters King could use in HiC. I'm not saying King is completely void of responsibility here, but I think he's moreso just a shill for editorial in this scenario. I don't like Tom King's storytelling approach most of the time, and he made plenty of bad decisions all on his own. So, don't think I'm discounting that.

    Psycamorean - Feb 13, 2020

    Also, I just want a sampling: Who here actually puts faith in comic book polls or awards? I do not, at all. I think they're a sham most of the time. A popularity contest, at best. And apropos of that, who puts faith in the comic book critics? Same answer for me. I think they're completely useless as a barometer of quality.

    Nihilist - Feb 13, 2020

    Exactly. Remember that The King's Speech and Black Panther won Oscars. Squirrel Girl won an Eisner. Billboard recently made a list of best rock songs of the decade, topped with Imagine Dragons and 21 Pilots. Kissinger and Obama won Nobel peace prizes. Skrillex won like a dozen of Grammy awards. Don't make me even start with Rock & Roll Hall of Fame snubs. The Beat named Female Furies and Goddess Mode two of the best comics of 2019. Bottomline, popularity contests are corporate circlejerks.

    Crimson Knight - Feb 13, 2020

    Most of the time i forget that awards in any media exist besides the Oscars. I know there's a lot o stigma and whatever surrounding them but sometimes it's just for entertainment and occasional movie idea.

    Crimson Knight - Feb 13, 2020

    The same goes for some comics like i know king isn't perfect but i enjoy his work

    myconius - Feb 13, 2020

    they can hand out all the awards they want. it won't keep the sales numbers from dropping off. .... no matter how much they polish it up. a turd is still just a turd.

    Crimson Knight - Feb 13, 2020

    Also quick tangent does anybody else thing Tomasi and Gleason's Batman&Robin was good. Cause i freaking love it!

    Toonstrack - Feb 13, 2020

    @Myconius... I dont really care about the circumstances around Alfreds death, nor does this book. As I said all that matters is that he is now dead, and this issue needed to be made as a result. I would much rather have this than for them to just ignore Alfred'a death and move on with no reminiscing. Thats what this issue is about... Reminiscing

    myconius - Feb 13, 2020

    sorry. no. . . . the fact that this story totally overlooked characters like Alfred's daughter Julia, or Leslie Thompkins shows that this was not about reminiscing. . . . this was nothing more than a cash grab. . . . . . a cheap memorial, celebrating a cheap and manipulative character death.

    Toonstrack - Feb 13, 2020

    It's about the Bat-family as advertised. Why would Julia mean anything now after being gone for years? These are about the people who were in Alfreds life regularly, his real family. And I will just have to disagree that the memorial was cheap, the emotional beats were there. deaths in comics are usually cash grabs IMO, Uncle Ben and Jean Grey are the only ones off the top of my head that arent and one of those characters are alive and well today. And for a cash grab I thougt it was solid.

    Nihilist - Feb 13, 2020

    Gwen Stacy was also pretty good. Albeit her death itself was kind of a cashgrab itself, but then again, it fleshed Peter out, changed him. This, in comparison, feels so fake and artifficially created. Half of the Bat Family didn't even make a single appearance in Batman's comics for years, it's hard to take this reunion seriously when nothing but Alfred's death has been set up.

    Psycamorean - Feb 13, 2020

    I wouldn't call Gwen Stacy's death a cashgrab because it was done for plot reasons. They had made Gwen Stacy hate Spider-Man and love Peter, and that became sort of a problem for the writers and editorial. It created a redundancy because that was essentially Aunt May's character. So, they originally wanted to kill off Aunt May.

    Psycamorean - Feb 13, 2020

    But the creative team decided she was too essential to Spider-Man, so then they optioned killing off Gwen or MJ. MJ was a much more popular character with the bullpen, so Gwen got the ax.

    Psycamorean - Feb 13, 2020

    Gerry Conway thought that Peter and Gwen were the perfect couple, so having them get married and all that would betray what Spider-Man is, so he killed off Gwen Stacy to end what he considered an unfitting relationship and to reinforce the element of personal tragedy that defines Spider-Man. It was, therefore, not a cashgrab, but rather what the writer thought was a necessary progression in the plot.

    myconius - Feb 13, 2020

    good point. why would Alfred's daughter (who also worked for Bruce in the Bat-cave for a time) mean anything?

    Br'er Lapin AKA 20-Ish Ceiln - Feb 13, 2020

    There is existing evidence that Alfred was not going to stay dead. There are a few messy mistakes in one of Tomasi's issues showing it was originally drawn with Alfred before hastily being replaced with Lucius Fox. Not kidding. He is legitimately still in one background of a panel.

    Psycamorean - Feb 14, 2020

    And also, he has since said that it was editorial's idea.

    myconius - Feb 14, 2020

    DC Stuff - yeah. King is a fraud and a coward. he can't assume responsibility for any of the terrible decisions he's made, and has to throw editorial under the bus. not to say that DC editorial is not trash.

    Psycamorean - Feb 14, 2020

    I believe it's editorial because of what happened with Nightwing. I think you and myconius have undue faith in them for no good reason.

    Psycamorean - Feb 14, 2020

    The type of jabs being thrown at Tom King, as well as your "evidence" are almost Trumpian. And that's fun for a laugh, but if we're going to be serious, it's clearly editorial who is at fault.

    Psycamorean - Feb 14, 2020

    I'm no Tom King fan, but I'm not a blind hater.

    LunaMoody - Feb 14, 2020

    I liked a lot of Kings run also. Dislike a lot as well. I think the biggest problem DC has right now with it's books and writers is that they are trying to write books/novel like stories and most of the writers just are not good enough to write that long or detail involved story. If King had wrote this as only a 12 issue arc it probably would have been amazing. But he tried to spread it out through his entire run and failed because of it.

    myconius - Feb 19, 2020

    DC Stuff - yeah, "figure it out later" that was the mantra to his ENTIRE run!! only he NEVER figured any of it out. the guy is clueless.

Reviews for the Week of...

May

April

More