found the authors burner

L O L one of the reasons you gave this book a bad rating was because it's only been 10 years... Boy do you have a lot to learn about DC and Marvel comics both

Been reading Marvel for 25 years. Yeah, that's one of the reasons but also because it is about as interesting as Garrison Kane in Cable.

You've been reading comics for 25 years, and you think any company keeps track of how many years have passed in continuity? Also secret wars happened like 4 years ago, and that's supposed to be a clean slate, no one knows how many years its been since start to finish

Why read comics if continuity means nothing ? It's literally the only thing that makes them stand out from cheaper and better forms of entertainment .

It is important, but asking a publisher to keep continuity in terms of years? That's a near impossible ask, and no publisher has any clear answer for that at all. Obviously events have happened, that's not what I'm saying, I'm saying it doesn't make sense to give a book a bad review because the publisher doesn't keep continuity in terms of years passed. That's literally impossible due to the company's long history

If the number of years was my only issue, this would be a 9.0/10 but it's BORING. Characters that we not only know nothing about and die right away, but characters that are generic genetic constructs... Literally bred to die on panel. Boring. It was boring. Obligatory for HoX, sure, but this is about as riveting as Malcolm and Randall's backstory. I give this issue a bad rating because there's nothing keeping me engaged, nothing keeping me turning the pages. I loved HoX, but this IS BORING.

gotcha, then guess we can agree to disagree. Just found the part where you put the number of years weird thats all

It's less about the fact that 10 years contradicts the rest of Marvel, than I feel like it was arbitrarily chosen to fit this logarithmic scale thing he came up with. Also, "Man-Machine Supremacy"? Who writes this stuff? Oh yeah, the guy whose big credits are ripping Jim Shooter's marketing project and making the remarkable Discovery that the Fantastic Four are A FAMILY! Everyone is so down on the post-IvX era for no reason but THIS is just so lame and contrived and predictable.

idk i guess different tastes then lol. Me personally, i love the stuff he's doing. The X-Men have been in a creative rut for the last couple of years for me, especially the IvX event

setting up hopefully a good story and mystery, which is why i like it. I'd rather not have a predictable story handed to me on a plate, which is why i like it

Moira sums up my final feelings on the issue: "It seems like the type of thing I SHOULD enjoy, and yet... I look around at all these [panels] and know it's just a show for those who need one. A distraction from what's really going on, if you will." What's really going on is they're bringing back Earth-1610 and this is the long setup.

That's a cool theory! See that's why I find it interesting, anything can happen in my eyes. But if you r set that that's what's happening then I guess you'd think mystery solved. For me, I like just savoring everything and waiting for next issues

That’s true.

It’s hard to understand bad writing. It’s apparently hard for King to understand how computers work as well.

Yup, it’s hard tho comprehend The greatness of Tom King’s writing. The depth of it and of his characters.

Guys I think I found Tom Kings burner account!

Nah, pretty sir they are just a troll.

Sure

I am giving it a like. For the sheer gall in his statement.

I wouldnt give it a 8, but this issue made sense for me.

i wonder who the parent account belong's to? the way they were review bombing that Spiderman story.

While I'm pretty sure this is a troll, you wouldn't believe the number of people that actually think they're smarter than others for liking Tom King

YourGreenMuse - how terribly ironic.

I'm not a troll and I don't think that I'm in someway smarter than you. Cheers.

Andrea D’Alò - you're not the one making numerous profiles, are you?

no, I am not making numerous profiles and I don't know why NoName is not answering.

i'm not sure. i could be wrong, but i read it as he was implying that towards the person making numerous accounts. at least that how i read it.

I think just because people like something others don’t, doesn’t mean he/ she made a fake account. This is a story you either hate or love it seems.

Darkseid24 - the admin of this site specifically called out this NoName97 person for making multiple profiles and review bombing. - - https://comicbookroundup.com/comic-books/reviews/marvel-comics/spider-man-life-story/2

I see. Didn’t know that.

and knowing is half the battle. (GGGGGGGGGGG. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. JOOOOOOOOOOOEEEEEEE!) sorry. the opportunity to use that quote was just way too tempting. 😂😂😂😂

Whatever you are quoting I don’t know it anyway 😂

What? How do you not know GI Joe?

Darkseid24 - check this short video out. >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFthiZ_Jftc

Thanks, never watched that lol

you're welcome :)

No, I’m not a troll and I love King.

Eisner nominated writer :).

Yeah, he's overrated. And I think this event is the one where most people realize that. But not you.

I listened to an interview of King talking about HIC& it made a lot of sense, so in the end HIC is ok for me, but I’m worried about Batman run.

it made a lot of sense. please do elaborate.

You shouldn’t have to listen to the writer explain the story on a podcast for it to make sense. If it doesn’t make sense on the page then it is crap writing.

I understood it before, but it was still interesting to hear, what King had to say. Didn’t sound like he hates Wally. I agree with him, that it would be wrong to just forget about his trauma.

He could have felt with his trauma without turning him to a bad guy.

True, but I don’t think Wally is a villain. It was an accident

That's not what made him a villain. It's what he did afterwards.

I think what messed Wally up was the fact that Linda didn't know him and their children didn't exist.

i still don't think that'd be enough to drive Wally to try to cover up that he was responsible for his friend's deaths, or frame Booster Gold for murder. the entire premise is forced and silly.

@DC Stuff read Flash War. That explains it. He was also on the Titans for the first 18 issues of the most recent run.

Yeah, Wally’s actions after the accident are what make him a villain. Not the accident itself. King destroyed a hero to fit his narrative that there is no hope by killing Rebirths symbol of it.

Whatever the case, I hope that writers will stop referring to HiC in their books and maybe someone, in the future, will write this thing out of continuity. Maybe when Doomsday Clock wraps up it will happen.

That is what a lot of people are hoping.

I think Doomsday Clock will have little to no impact on the DCU.

King was referring to his trauma of loosing everything thanks to Barry, but I also think the reason, why Wally broke was, because everyone else payed no attention to his trauma. Especially because it’s not the same. Bruce, Superman, WW, Barry haven’t lost everything, so it’s disrespectful to act like they did. I also don’t think what he did afterwards is worse than killing people. He was quite emotional there& as long as he doesn’t kill again he’s not a villain. I also think Doomsday Clock won’t

have any impact, especially because King said in his interview Barry is responsible for New52, while Doomsday Clock had the intention to blame Dr. Manhatten for it. It was also delayed again for like 2-3 months. Newest issue will be released end of May.

You don’t think that his going around and mutilating and staging the bodies of his “friends” to frame two innocent people is worse than accidentally losing control, no matter how much bullshit that was, and killing people? Seriously? How do you not see how those are the actions of a villain?

King can say that his fairy godmother was responsible for the New52, he’s not in a position to make any definitive calls for the greater DC universe. Until Dido, Lee, or preferably Johns make that definitive call, it’s all supposition. Snyder seems to have a large say these days too. With how crappy DC is doing right now, they should definitely use DDC to reset things. Again.

i've not been the biggest fan of Doomsday Clock, but i can appreciate it a lot more than HiC. i really hope DDC will actually reset all this nonsense that has been polluting the DCU as of late.

I’m a fan of DDC but it’s had some pacing issues outside of the ridiculous delays. My biggest complaint is that they shouldn’t have started Rebirth with everything binging on DDC if they couldn’t produce it on time. Or he’ll, at least close to on time. These delays are putting it over a year behind schedule I think? Ridiculous

Blaming other people for the murder makes Wally look like an ass, but killing his friends who trusted him is worse. However given the circumstances I think you can excuse both. Batman also once abandoned his lover in prison, framing her for murder, while he ran free instead of helping her in Bruce Wayne Fugitive. Again heroes aren’t perfect, they are flawed as well. I also think King has more to say these days in DC than Johns. I don’t want any of the two have a word in this. Both ruined

characters. However Didio allows King to do whatever he wants. And I don’t want another reboot as it was originally hinted with Doomsday Clock.

We’re going to have to agree to disagree here. I think accidental killings are bad but the lengths he went to to cover them up are the actions of a bad guy and I don’t see how that can be overcome. Batman leaving Sasha in prison while he solved Vespers murder was shitty but it wasn’t even in the same ballpark as what King had Wally do. Other than Batman and this travesty, I don’t know that King has had any real influence in the DCU. If anything, most writers seem to actively ignore the shit he

Writes. That’s why you rarely see his stories references anywhere else.

I guess we have. Both is bad, but trying to cover it up didn’t kill anyone& he’s not a villain, because he immediately regretted it. Otherwise he wouldn’t have killed himself& send it to Lois. Batman didn’t kill anyone that’s true, but it was an asshole move, just like Wally, but Wally was traumatized, while Batman just wanted to move on. He also didn’t leave Sasha to solve the murder, he left her to kill off Bruce Wayne& to just be Batman. Kings stories have a lot of influence.

There are references in Red Hood, Batgirl, Titans, Nightwing, Catwoman. If anything Detective Comics doesnt get referenced, but Kings Batman run& HIC definitely get.

It sucks, but King has a lot to say in DC currently. I however also don’t want Johns back. He ruined my favorite characters after all.

Again, you’re equating mutilating the bodies of his friends and framing two innocent people with being an asshole? Hell, there are serial killers who’ve regretted their actions initially. King has been around for 70 issues now and has not been referenced much at all. He’s had some references in a couple of Bat related books but nothing like you’d think. Even HiC has only been referenced a couple of times. I think you’re highly overestimating his influence.

He wrote a message in his victims blood. That is deliberate and psychopathic behavior.

If you don't agree with Talon1load you're a troll. Same stuff I've come to know and avoid from them on CBR forums.

Actually, your comment here is kind of trolling. Sooooo

Instead of attacking me, why don’t you talk about this issue like we are.

It’s of course an asshole behavior, but nothing most people wouldn’t do. I thought it was worse what Green Lantern did in Cosmic Oddysey, since he killed billions of innocent out of mere stupidity& arrogance. He still was redeemed& so will be Wally. Wally has an excuse at least. And you are underestimating his influence. His stories get referenced in so many books I already told you. While Detective Comics doesn’t. According to interviews his City of Bane will also tie in Years of the villains,

which is DCs Next big event. DC also wouldn’t allow a writer to write a story like HIC, if said writer doesn’t have their trust& influence.

"If you don't agree with Talon1load you're a troll. Same stuff I've come to know and avoid from them on CBR forums." UHMMM. NO.

Last weeks review is the first that I recall ever interacting with Andrea and he was definitely trolling. Either way, why not actually talk to merits of the book?

Not going to say more than this but it's common for you, Talon, to reply to a reader's comment about enjoying a book by calling them a troll or saying they must mean it sarcastically. Then you always follow up with "don't talk about me, talk about the book" which disregards the fact that you made it personal in the first place. Nobody should have to defend their appreciation for a comic book to you. No offense intended. Just tired of it.

You do use the troll thing quite often, Talon1load.

i'd still like to know who the main account of NoName97 belongs to. i'd imagine they were doing quite a bit of review bombing to get called out by the site's admin.

I’ve called Andrea a troll twice but he was literally trolling. Other than that, I’ve questioned if people who give 10/10’s for books that are crap according to most other reviewers. Perhaps I’ve been wrong but I don’t think so. You mention me making it personal, I call them troll when they come to argue without providing anything of substance regarding the book. Andrea literally argued with me about his inability to understand proper English. He was trolling. But, I’ll try to stop calling peopl

People trolls.

I don’t think someone is a troll just because he disagrees with most reviews. Otherwise I also would be one with Nightwing. People have different taste. That’s it, but giving Batman 68 10/10, I also question that lol

For me HiC is a 10/10 because King talks about humanity and the sense of loss though superheroes, and for other reasons of course. For me Batman 68 in a 10/10 because King talks about love, to be loved and to love in a Batman story, re-defining the character of Batman in a very coherent way.

Now, am I trolling?

I also wrote a few lines in my review, if you want to answer do it there, on MY review, ok?

If that's your reason, you need to consume more media. Because neither of those issues are groundbreaking like you seem to believe.

Thank you, Andrea. Both issues were excellent and it's messed up that one has to defend what they're enjoying.

i still would like to know who this burner account belongs to.

Your opinion isn’t what makes you a troll. The stupid incessant arguing you did last week about the way a review was written does.

Ok.

Batman 68 was a waste, HIC 8 was ok, but nothing groundbreaking or deep character exploration. I mean how? The way the fear gas reacted made zero sense& so did Bruce’s „nightmares“. They didn’t fit his character at all. Writing characters out of character isn’t groundbreaking, it’s just bad writing.

Books cancelled Justice League tiein was a lame cliffhanger