-
10
For me this is the best issue so far.
It is written very old school. Very early 80s Batman with many small subplots going on at once.
Jimenez nails the small moments so well.
-
10
Fraction does it again.
-
9.0
The story is flowing nicely, but it’s the art that made me care. Despite his preference for Manga faces, that make his art look somewhat shallow at first glance, Jimenez is a capable storyteller. There are small moments, gestures, facial expressions, that elevate this issue from a good to a great comic.
-
9.0
I think what makes this first three issues special and fresh is that Matt Fraction is not trying to deconstruct Batman or break him down. Sure, it's a simple story where Batman and Tim Drake are framed for a crime to commit. But his humor and Jorge Jiminez art as well as Toreu Morey's coloring just makes Gotham seem more bright and colorful. Instead of being dark and purple, Gotham City is bright blue and green, and I actually feel Gotham City as alive.
Again, usually Batman is a dark brooding serious hero, but him disappearing behind Harvey and Commissioner Gordon's back, him getting kicked in the balls by Damiain Wayne doesn't make me roll my eyes. Matt Fraction's writing is executed well here, and it's nice to feel Matt Fraction's earnest and hopeful Batman. While it's nice seeing Batman be at his lowest point and rise, I want to preface that we had that Tom King, James Tynion IV, and Chip Zdarsky. Almost 3 runs back to back (Joshua Williamson's Batman was still solid, but it was a placeholder) had the same concept, so it just feels way better seeing a different story (unless Matt Fraction drops the ball in the future).
Also, I love how Jorge Jiminez has slowly been evolving as the definitive Batman artist of 2020s. His work on Matt Fraction, Chip Zdarsky and James Tynion IV feel and look so different from each other, you can tell which artist is who. more
-
8.5
Detailed character work once again from Fraction is helping set the stage for the inevitable confrontations to come, with Savage, with Strange, with Bernard, and more. I like that he’s delving into less commonly used villains and preserving past continuity to a large degree. The art remains gorgeous, the best work Jimenez has done! This may not be the flashy, plot-driven Uber-Bat portrayal we were used to under King, Tynion and Zdarsky, but it’s far more compelling and interesting to this reader. A massive breath of fresh air.
-
8.0
A lot of moving parts that I think keep this really interesting.
-
6.0
I think this is a good issue to reach some conclusions about this new series. unfortunately, I do feel that something is missing. this issue is quite fragmented, being made up of a lot of different episodes that don't really seem connected. there's nothing really driving the narrative and things just seem to happen. the Riddler suddenly appears with no explanation as to what he's doing or why he's there. On the Riddler, I find his constant extremely weak riddles quite grating. they seem like the worst Dad jokes in the World rather than anything meaningful and profound. I find the Vandal Savage thread intriguing. However, there has to be more to him than simply wanting to go after Batman. it's not entirely unreasonable that a police commissioner would have a vigilante in his sights, even if his methods are corrupt. Savage needs to have some bigger plan in place for him to feel truly villainous. the artwork continues to impress, but Fraction needs to get things going pretty quickly, I feel more
-
4.0
If you’re having trouble sleeping, then give this comic a try.
Nice art. Story? ……….. ZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz 😴😴😴
-
4.0
This may be better than Chip's run, but not by much. Savage drops a batarang at the crime scene. Apparently both he and Fraction are too stupid to realize that the medical examiner will debunk this in 2 seconds. Then we have to deal with Barnard. I was hoping Bruce would put his face through the wall. They were in a hospital anyway. He'll be fine. Instead, we get a cringe scene of a teenager chastising an adult. Just awful. If this doesn't get better, it'll be a ton of bricks. Dropped.
My Comic Review Channel - https://youtu.be/HiZds_UkaVw
-
4.0
Great art. But I just don’t like the story. The cop shootout last issue gets a flashback where we see a youth recording it on a smart phone. During the issue, we see him him go to a guy at a diner who is a newspaper reporter. It seems the kid also recorded Vandal planting a batarang to frame Batman.
We see Bruce try to visit Tim in the hospital, but he is intercepted by Bernard, who points out every time Tim gets together with Bruce he gets hurt. We also see Bruce turn down great profits by not building weapons. Bats also captures Riddler,who can only communicate with riddles. And we learn that Arkham is experimenting on patients - again.
I guess my problems are two-fold. One - it reads like a greatest hits story. We Have seen a lot of these elements before. The arms thing was done in Batman Begins. The Arkham thing has been done in Telltale games. You see where I am going.
Two - the “realistic” elements aren’t very real. In this day and age more than one person would have recorded the shootout. Everyone has smart phones. And a police shooting site would be surrounded by 25 tv news crews. There would have been a huge crowd in front of the police tape. Finally, the police photographers would have taken a lot of photos long before Savage ever showed up. Also, the reporter in the diner was reading a physical newspaper. No one does that these days. Also, the kid would have posted the video on YouTube or TikTok or wherever.
By trying to be “real” the story becomes more fake. I get the feeling that Fraction has one foot in 2025 and one foot in 1999. It’s really hard to stay up with the latest trends and old timers can easily be left behind.
Finally, Bernard. The kid actually has a point. The problem is “handsome young man who is gay ends up with a lot of bruises every time he goes away on a weekend with billionaire Bruce Wayne” really raises Jeffery Epstein vibes. It really brings up all those bad Batman/Robin are more than friends cartoons. By bringing this up, Fraction creates a situation that can’t be handwaved away. We know what is going on, but it makes Bruce look like a real creep, and that isn’t a good look. Again you can’t have it both ways - brining real world issues but have comic book results.
Also, since when did Batman need a high tech stealth suit to beat up the Riddler? I guess I am just not digging Fraction’s Batman. It doesn’t bother me the way previous writers’ work has. But it just doesn’t do anything for me. It just doesn’t strike me as good.
Or I could be wrong. more
-
I had this vibe, but i was not sure. Now i am. This is definitely inspired by norm breyfogle and alan grant.
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9.0
-
9.0
-
9.0
-
9.0
-
8.5
-
8.5
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
7.0
-
7.0
-
4.0