Sorry but a 1 is rediculous, u can not like chips run all u want and he's done some silly stuff but a 1 for this is stupid, it's quite a competent issue that has its merits. Not perfect buy certainly not a 1

that is your opinion, which is not the only one. If Quinn thinks this is a one, he can think it.

I'm going to give this a shot because I need a good Batman story. In my humble opinion, Zdarsky's last arc was interminable. Ram's Detective also lost me long ago. I'm not at all interested in a 2-year dive into Bruce Wayne's psyche. Get back on the street and fight some crime again.

I gave it higher than a 1 but I get the frustration. Rams run wasn’t good. How many more times is the bat gonna lose Gotham. Feels like we are just setting up to lose Gotham again.

For sure not a 1 but I'll give u a like for the great written review

And of course, as usual, since it is Tom King, he gets the characters in the imaginary stories he pens also all wrong, having them think and act of character, because he generally could care less about the actual characters... just the narrative he promotes.

.... Dude, everytine i read a review of yours, It has a lot of crazy stuff. You're strange, man.

CIA's Tom King

Menudo crack JAJAJAJAJ

Totally agree

Yeah, I feel like Hal did show growth across Johns’ run and Venditti’s HJGLC. We saw Hal deal with seeing Carol in serious relationships (she was even married when he came back to life), then they move into a close friendship, then back to a romantic couple (well after her divorce). Hal has gained maturity. He’s situated to be able to have a more stable hero life - we’ve got lots of GLs. I hope the run gives him and Carol development toward The End. The immaturity cycle is what feels forced.

Yeah, totally. What I like about Hal is that he seems like an inmature character, and sometimes he is, but he always ends Up behaving like a Hero and an adult Who knows how yo deal with the weight he has. Here we simply see that inmaturity multiplied, and nothing more. Its still soon so i hope It gets better.

You, sir, are my hero. I keep reading about this is a return to basics, couple of problems. One, Hal as a pilot makes no sense in 2023. The secret identity thing does not work for him. He is a fun-time cop. That is his day job. Two, he is not supposed to be stupid, yet you nail it. They are writing him as a stupid 20 year old who is afraid he will miss out on life but won’t change his bad habits. Not a good look. Keep up the good work.

I took him getting a job more as he’s stuck on Earth after quitting to GLC and needs money, not that he’s specifically trying to maintain a secret identity.

Could be, so fair enough. But I still maintain that the whole going back to Ferris Air is just silly. I think Jusonemore gets it right. But I could be wrong. And let’s face it, Hal know a lot of people like Bruce Wayne, who can get him gainful employment without Hal being creepy around ex-girlfriend.

Funny to me how a low score isnt valid, or objective but a high score? That's acceptable and objective amirite?

oh, no, don't get me wrong, I don't mean to criticize the fact that there are bad grades, everyone is free to comment, but there is also no denying the fact that an important part of the spiderman fandom is quite toxic and sometimes they have somewhat strange, repetitive, or bad opinions or arguments

Honestly, I'm glad you enjoyed it @justonemore. I dont think we should ostracize or really criticize people for liking issues we dont like and vice versa

It was prolly me just making a snap judgement then. I'm simply sick of everyone claiming something is "review bombed" when lots of ppl express dislike for something, but ignore that the perfect scores things get are review bombing in the opposite direction. It happens on games and movies too, just something that grinds my gears. I apologize if I took it wrong.

there is always going to be toxic reactions (you could say both good and bad even) - the way to combat it is just to give your honest opinion and give reasons in your reviews of why you like or dislike something. Most toxic responses are vague, over-the-top statements with lots of exclamation points

In the post-Crisis era Luthor was Metropolis's big hero till Superman arrived. That's why he resented Superman so much in that continuity.. It seems they're going back to that kind of root in their rivalry which has been unused since Infinite Crisis reshaped their history. Frankly I enjoy seeing Luthor the businessman again rather than Luthor the mad scientist or wannabe Supervillain. He's more resourceful and dangerous that way-even when in jail.

This isn't even a review. I give this review a 1/10.

here you have a review. this is a six issue miniseries about jon that started with a plot about ultraman killing supermans. After that, it turns out that ultraman is killed and suddenly the plot changes to something completely different in which the protagonist barely has a role, and that Taylor uses as a fan service excuse to return to the world of unjustice. How is a series going to be good that ends its main plot at two issues and stops completely? Nothing convinced me.

What is "Unjustice"? Also, you keep forgetting proper capitalization. You do make some good points with Ultraman, but the thing is, the plot was never about Ultraman. He was just a stepping stone for bigger things. Overall, 6/10 review.

Don't listen to people who obviously haven't read the comic as they don't even leave one detail in their review about it.

Are you kidding me, right? JAJAJJAJA. You are saying that based on nothing, in fact, i leave detalles of the plot in the comment un your review, I read the issue and I liked It, ay least respect It.

Oh, Im sorry, Im from Spain and Im not that good ay english jajajajja

"it's not that bad". So you're saying it actually is bad, just not as bad as others say. Then I don't see how 8.5 is an adequate rating for something that is bad. Also, if you don't think this is that bad, you have to consider that the characters in this run have a lot of history that has showed the kind of people they are. The choices they've been making go against all of it. We've seen weirder stuff but the characters have remained consistent to what they stand for in those cases.

Ok, but what if I've read it more than once? I still think this is rubbish, and Marvel should focus on bringing better stories and not waste time trying to keep two people apart

This is probably your first Spider-Man run if you think it’s good. Even if it is, this issue should still seem terrible

I have read every run of this decade, and more. I just have a different opinion, and its completely fine, every person have an opinion, and yours its not the one and only to have the right to say "should still seem terrible".

And here I thought this issue was objectively bad, no matter how u look at it, it baffles me how much this writer belittles spidey as a whole, with such a lazy and incompetent writing, how someone could think this is good is beyond me, honestly.

Play a game of how many of these people are just alts for other accounts.

Going through the trouble of creating another account, which means opening a new email, linking a phone number to it, etc. It's too much of a hassle to make an alt account just to write a comment on a review for one single issue of a comic, in a page that's very obscure compared to other review sites like rotten tomatoes. Remember that you enjoying a comic and saying "give it a shot" does not equate to a review. You should point out the reasons why it is a well written entertainment product.

All you need to do to create an alt on this website is use one of those temp email websites. You don't even need an actual email address, a phone number, etc. Most people have more than one legitimate email anyway.

You know what? You might be right. Out of 5 accounts, aside from mine, only one wasn't created the same day it made a comment. And that one was created like 2 days before. Didn't think someone would be sad or obsessed enough to do that. I still think a review should be objective though.