-
10
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, it was fun, canonically buggy, yet it's what DC has come down to now, to please the fandom. Rosenberg's writing is mediocre, but much better than Taylor's so far.
-
9.0
Wow. This is exactly what I expected out of this first issue, and I absolutely loved it. A zombie Suicide Squad pitch just works so well in its own right and now that it’s an ongoing series, I’m super pumped to continue to read on.
Barrows’ art is so phenomenal, as always, and the overall story and vibe of the book are so great. I can’t wait to read further into the story and just have a blast with this one. This may be my personal favorite new DC book in a long time.
-
9.0
Funny delivery, art is good.
-
9.0
Foi um bom passa tempo e a arte está espetacular.
-
8.5
Entertaining, Rosenberg notably obsessed with Zdarsky, Eddy's art is great.
-
8.0
We see that Amanda Waller and her ilk needed to step up their game from using convicted criminals as disposable soldiers as they've decided to throw zombie criminals at their problems instead.
https://youtu.be/2P_lFToc2SU
-
8.0
It is not the best I have read, but it is much better than what is being done with Nightwing and Superman son
-
8.0
A fun delivery, not so exciting and I know it can be a disappointment since something related to a celebration of fear should not have the excess of humor of this number, much less after DCeased: Unkillables and Dead planet. I'll give this series a try.
-
8.0
A fun book, solid writing and fantastic art by the great Eddy Barrows
-
7.5
This is a pretty good start. I have faith that Matthew Rosenberg will make it a lot more fun as it gears up. Also, what the fuck is Merlyn smoking? This dude is legitimately insane. Holy shit lol.
-
7.5
Una penosa entrega, no me sorprende realmente, vi a el trabajo de Matt con Grifter y el hombre solo hace payasadas. Termino hundiendo el barco.
En esto es lo mismo, es carente de creatividad. Sin embargo no saca toda esa mierda progre y de política de izquierda que me toca los cojones, tiene su parte divertida, pero eso es todo. Lo que ayuda es es arte y el color.
-
7.5
Not bad, but not magnificent either, Barrows' art lifts this issues.
Yet I keeps asking me, what idiot came up with putting scars on Jason's back? It is illogical, he repairs all those who enter the well completely, this and the Y on the chest is from amateur writings published in the Tumblr.
-
7.0
A delivery with a mediocre writing even for an Elseword, nothing exciting. The good art is Eddy always a pleasure to see him take the pencil.
I agree with some of the points that two or three readers made regarding the inconsistency of Jason's scars, which looks more like a burn, although as outside of canon it is acceptable. Also this is not the worst writing.
-
7.0
It wasn't the best starter, the art is decent except for the thing they put on JT's back that looks like someone vomited on it. Canonically Jason does not have scars from when he died and it is stupid and illogical to insist on the subject like the Y of the autopsy. But what can I say, DC is currently full of shoddy fanfiction.
-
6.5
The art is good, but the story isn't very compelling.
-
6.5
You know how you can always tell a writer even without looking at the cover just by his quirks? Like Ewing always rants about "the esoteric" or "synchronicity", King puts songs in it, Bendis has that dialogue like the characters are all Muppets or Cantwell cries about white privilege. Well, for Rosenberg is always the "we don't use that word here". His obsession with controlling other people's language is always a theme, a side-effect from staying too much on twitter, probably. And so when Jason uses the word "monsters" for Bane or Man-Bat, Rosenberg is quick to point out that they are just misunderstood people wanting to redeem themselves even though that's total bullshit. Ok, maybe for Man-Bat that is the case but it's not for Bane certainly. He also has a problem with the word "zombies" in a book with... zombies. Dude is unredeemable (see what I did there?).
Anyway overall the book is pretty dull. Jason looks like shit with the crowbars. After DC chickened out on the guns because propaganda I thought they were leaving him with swords. Nope, turns out those are off the table too and now he's stuck with crowbars. The whole crowbar motif has been worn thin to the point it's just annoying and again, it looks stupid and it sounds stupid. A vigilante with guns in a city like Gotham has chances of surviving it, a vigilante with swords maybe, but a vigilante with freaking crowbars is dead meat.
And the whole forced parallel between Jason and his teammates is also a fallacy. No, Jason isn't like Man-Bat, Bane or the Arkham Knight. He has helped the Bat-family for the last years and even in his "villain" phase he has kept the collateral damage to a minimum and has adhered to a set of principles that allowed him to keep innocents out of harm's way. He's an antihero not a supervillain so he has very few in common with the likes of Bane.
Overall a pretty bad first issue where Barrows saves the book but I can't say my expectations for this to get better are pretty high. more
-
6.5
This was the biggest dissapointment of the week. I expected a lot of this story. Dont get wrong, this first issue is fun and good... but it's just that.
There are some weird moments when Bane can talk but other character can't. Still, im kinda interested for the Lazarus resine subplot.
So... yeah... it's fun, kinda good, Barrows art really nailed :T
-
6.0
Too many jokes and bad villains, this is to please the fandom. It seems like DC writers are looking for their stories on Wattpad or AO3. Nothing exciting, just the art here is decent.
-
6.0
What the hell was this? Currently the writers have such a childish writing and this man only knows how to clown his characters. It is destroying a good character here, well they are destroying them all.
It's funny what happens. They do very youthful writing but they started the only comic that would be viable for this type of narrative SuperSons and for what?
I don't think Jason Todd is a character for this type of writing, he has a very dark past, the child of abuse, we are talking about family violence and addiction. He was brutally murdered and brought back to life to be thrown into a bloody arena.
He became a selective killer and sometimes a bit insane. He's the slaughterous bat, the one who bears the burden of redemption if it is the opposite case., not the delicate and sweet pink robin.
You can't give it such silly writing. I'm done with DC. more
-
6.0
this time I almost agree with the troll, bad enough this delivery. Rosenberg is like Taylor, he wouldn't write well even if his life depended on it.
-
4.0
Bland, dull, and cliched, with embarrassingly bad art. Man-Bat died for this? lol
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9.5
-
9.5
-
9.0
-
9.0
-
9.0
-
9.0
-
8.5
-
8.5
-
8.5
-
8.5
-
8.5
-
8.5
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
8.0
-
7.5
-
7.5
-
7.5
-
7.5
-
7.5
-
7.5
-
7.5
-
7.0
-
7.0
-
7.0
-
6.5
-
6.0
-
4.5
-
1.0